Appalachian Community Histories – Austinville, Wythe County: Chiswell’s Lead Mines, the American Revolution, and the Civil War
Along the New River in southwestern Virginia, the small community of Austinville occupies a place in American history far greater than its size might suggest. Long before the community acquired its present name, the surrounding hills contained one of the most important lead deposits in colonial America, providing a mineral that would become essential to frontier settlement, the American Revolution, and the Civil War. The mines helped sustain armies, attracted entrepreneurs and skilled laborers, and established an industrial settlement whose influence extended well beyond the mountains of Virginia.
Austinville also possesses an unusual political history. During the 1770s, the settlement known as the Lead Mines served as the county seat of Fincastle County, a vast Virginia jurisdiction that included all of present-day Kentucky. Among the families connected to the mining industry was that of Moses Austin, whose son, Stephen F. Austin, was born in the community in 1793 and later became one of the most influential figures in the settlement of Texas.
Yet the history of Austinville was not simply one of mineral discoveries and westward expansion. Its mines depended upon enslaved labor, became entangled in Revolutionary-era violence, and endured repeated changes of ownership before developing into a major industrial operation during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. From the colonial mining ventures of John Chiswell to the operations of the New Jersey Zinc Company, Austinville’s history reveals how one Appalachian community became connected to several defining periods of American development.
John Chiswell and the Discovery of Lead Along the New River
The origins of Austinville’s mining industry are traditionally traced to Colonel John Chiswell, a Virginia planter, military officer, and land speculator who became associated with valuable lead deposits along the New River during the middle of the eighteenth century. According to a longstanding local account, Chiswell discovered the mineral deposits in 1756 after entering a cave while avoiding a confrontation with Native Americans. The site subsequently became known as Chiswell’s Hole, and the surrounding mining operations acquired the name Chiswell’s Lead Mines.
Although this account appears in numerous historical summaries, the discovery date remains uncertain. Historian Mary B. Kegley, writing in The Smithfield Review in 2010, examined colonial records and found that the commonly repeated dates from the 1750s were not supported by surviving contemporary documentation. Her research established that Chiswell received permission on May 6, 1760, to survey 1,000 acres along both sides of the New River, while John Robinson received permission to survey an adjoining tract of equal size. Chiswell’s survey was completed on October 31, 1760, and entered into the land records the following year.
The earliest mining efforts were concentrated around Chiswell’s Hole, a cave-like opening accessible from the river, although more substantial deposits were eventually worked on the southern side of the waterway. The presence of lead offered considerable commercial promise at a time when British colonists needed the metal for ammunition, household goods, and other manufactured products. Nevertheless, discovering a mineral deposit and transforming it into a profitable enterprise were two different undertakings, particularly in a mountainous region where transportation remained difficult and skilled workers were relatively scarce.
Chiswell entered into business with prominent Virginians, including John Robinson, speaker of the House of Burgesses, and William Byrd III of Westover. Their Lead Mining Company, established in 1761, represented an ambitious attempt to develop the mineral resources of the frontier. The venture also operated within territory claimed by the Cherokee, whose relationship with Virginia colonists had become increasingly strained as settlement expanded westward.
The importance of the mines to colonial expansion appears in the Treaty of Hard Labor, signed on October 14, 1768, between British representatives and Cherokee leaders. The treaty identified Chiswell’s Mine as a landmark in defining territorial boundaries, demonstrating that the mining property had already become sufficiently established to serve as a geographical reference in imperial negotiations. The agreement was part of a wider process through which British authorities sought additional Indigenous territory for colonial settlement.
Welsh Miners, Enslaved Labor, and the First Mining Community
The development of Chiswell’s mines required workers capable of extracting ore and transforming it into usable lead. Early efforts were unsuccessful, and a deposition later preserved in a Wythe County legal dispute described how the original workforce struggled to produce the metal until Chiswell recruited experienced workers from overseas.
In April 1763, Chiswell entered into an agreement in Bristol, England, with William Herbert and other skilled workers associated with the Welsh mining industry. The arrangement provided transportation to Virginia and promised employment for several years. Among those connected to the enterprise were members of the Herbert and Jenkins families, whose experience helped establish more effective smelting operations.
Kegley’s examination of the historical records identifies several of these workers and reveals the substantial contribution they made to the mines. According to the testimony of William Bell, who had worked for Chiswell, lead production increased considerably after the arrival of the experienced miners. Their work helped transform a speculative mineral venture into an operating industrial establishment.
The workforce, however, included far more than skilled European laborers. Enslaved African Americans were brought to the mines to perform the exhausting work of extracting ore, processing materials, and supporting the furnaces. Research published by historian Sean Gallagher in Encyclopedia Virginia identifies at least thirty-six enslaved Black workers associated with the early operations.
The physical demands of eighteenth-century lead mining were considerable. Workers excavated ore from underground passages, transported heavy material, prepared charcoal for the furnaces, and performed other labor necessary to maintain production. The isolation of the mines also meant that supplies, food, tools, and equipment had to be brought into the region over difficult roads.
For enslaved workers, these conditions were compounded by the absence of freedom and the constant threat of punishment. Their experiences would become particularly significant during the American Revolution, when Virginia authorities increasingly relied upon the mines as both an industrial resource and a place of forced labor.
Meanwhile, Chiswell’s original business arrangement suffered from financial difficulties and scandal. John Robinson died in 1766 after irregularities involving public funds became known, and Chiswell died later that year following his involvement in a widely publicized criminal case. William Byrd III also experienced severe financial problems, leaving the enterprise burdened by debts and complicated ownership arrangements.
Despite these troubles, the mines continued to operate, and the settlement that formed around them soon acquired another important function.
The Lead Mines and the Lost County of Fincastle
In 1772, colonial Virginia established Fincastle County from portions of Botetourt County. The new jurisdiction was extraordinarily large, covering an immense western territory that included present-day Kentucky, portions of what later became West Virginia, and substantial areas of southwestern Virginia.
For the county seat, colonial authorities selected the Lead Mines settlement near the New River. When the first Fincastle County court convened in January 1773, the mining community became the administrative center of a county whose boundaries extended far beyond the settled portions of Virginia.
The courthouse stood on a hillside near the mouth of Mine Mill Creek, not far from the New River. Its location was controversial almost immediately, since many residents considered the site inconvenient for a county of such enormous dimensions.
Mary B. Kegley’s research describes contemporary objections to the courthouse grounds, which lacked a convenient spring, sufficient pasture, and an adequate supply of nearby timber. Its position away from the principal road also created difficulties for travelers required to attend court proceedings.
Nevertheless, the Lead Mines remained the county seat during Fincastle County’s brief existence, bringing judges, attorneys, landowners, surveyors, and other visitors into a settlement already supported by industrial activity.
The county also became associated with one of the earliest political declarations supporting colonial resistance to Great Britain. On January 20, 1775, a group of Fincastle County freeholders adopted an address to Virginia’s representatives at the Continental Congress. Published in the Virginia Gazette on February 10, the document became known as the Fincastle Resolutions.
The resolutions expressed support for the Continental Congress and declared the willingness of frontier colonists to defend their rights against British interference. Among the prominent participants were William Christian, William Preston, Arthur Campbell, and William Campbell, men whose activities would later become closely associated with the Revolutionary War in the southern mountains.
Although the resolutions are frequently connected to Austinville because of its status as the county seat, the precise meeting location deserves clarification. Historical scholarship, particularly the research of Jim Glanville, indicates that the gathering probably occurred at James McGavock’s tavern near Fort Chiswell, approximately nine miles from the Lead Mines. The document therefore belongs to the political history of Fincastle County and the surrounding region, rather than being securely established as an event held at the mining settlement itself.
Fincastle County did not survive the Revolution. On December 7, 1776, Virginia authorized its division into Kentucky, Washington, and Montgomery counties, with the changes becoming effective at the end of that year. The old courthouse at the Lead Mines consequently lost its administrative importance, and the newly established Montgomery County selected a location near Fort Chiswell for its courthouse.
When Wythe County was formed from Montgomery County in 1790, the Lead Mines became part of the new jurisdiction, where the community remains today.
Lead for Independence and the American Revolution
As political tensions developed into armed conflict, Virginia’s lead mines became an increasingly important military resource. Muskets and other firearms required large quantities of lead ammunition, and the colonies could not rely upon a dependable supply from British manufacturers.
In July 1775, the Virginia Provincial Convention arranged to lease Chiswell’s mines for wartime production. The decision placed the mining operation under government supervision and transformed what had been a financially troubled private enterprise into a resource serving the Patriot cause.
The strategic importance of the mines became clear as fighting expanded throughout the colonies. In 1776, American officials considered their continued operation essential to supplying troops, particularly those serving in the southern and western regions where transportation routes made imported military supplies difficult to obtain.
By October of that year, mine managers reported having approximately ten tons of lead ready for military use. Although the total amount produced during the Revolutionary War cannot be established with certainty, surviving correspondence demonstrates that the mines repeatedly received orders to supply ammunition and raw materials to American forces.
Thomas Jefferson’s correspondence provides particularly important evidence of their military significance. In a letter to William Preston dated June 15, 1780, Jefferson discussed the need to protect the mines while arranging for supplies of powder and lead to reach troops serving in Kentucky. His instructions required militia forces from Washington and Montgomery counties to replace soldiers who had been guarding the mining works.
Only a few weeks later, on July 3, Jefferson wrote to William Campbell after receiving reports of a dangerous Loyalist uprising along the New River. According to the information reaching the governor, the insurgents might attempt to destroy the lead mines, prompting Jefferson to direct Campbell to organize militia forces and protect the facility.
The danger was substantial because destruction of the mines could have disrupted ammunition supplies at a time when the Revolutionary struggle remained unsettled. Their protection became part of a wider military effort involving regional militia officers, frontier settlements, and the transportation of supplies toward Kentucky and the southern armies.
The mines also came under the supervision of Colonel Charles Lynch, a Virginia militia officer whose name would later become associated with extrajudicial punishment. Lynch oversaw production while confronting labor shortages, political divisions, and suspected Loyalist activity around the mining district.
By the end of the Revolution, Chiswell’s Lead Mines had helped sustain American military operations through some of the war’s most difficult years. Yet the labor system responsible for producing much of that ammunition exposed a contradiction at the center of the Revolutionary struggle.
Enslaved Workers and the Story of Aberdeen
The American Revolution brought promises of liberty and independence, but the lead mines also became a place where Virginia authorities imprisoned enslaved people who had attempted to gain their freedom.
Following Lord Dunmore’s November 1775 proclamation offering freedom to enslaved people who escaped Patriot owners and joined British forces, Virginia revolutionaries confronted the problem of what to do with those they captured. In December 1775, the Virginia Convention ordered enslaved prisoners to be sent to the lead mines for labor.
Sean Gallagher’s research identifies at least thirty-two enslaved prisoners taken after the Battle of Great Bridge who were directed toward the mines, along with additional enslaved people purchased or confiscated by the government. The operation consequently became part of Virginia’s wartime system of state-controlled forced labor.
Records maintained by Charles Lynch document some of the individuals held there. A list prepared in 1779 included enslaved women named Lucy, Phillis, Sarah, and Phoebe, while other surviving accounts mention people who attempted to escape or resisted their confinement.
Conditions were harsh. In a June 10, 1782, letter to Governor Benjamin Harrison, commercial agent William Hay relayed complaints concerning the management of the mines, including reports that workers were being fed little more than bread and water while subjected to excessive demands. The correspondence also referred to the use of Lynch’s Law against people accused of wrongdoing in the surrounding community.
One of the most revealing documents from this period concerns Aberdeen, an enslaved man who petitioned the Virginia House of Delegates for freedom on November 5, 1783.
Aberdeen explained that his enslaver, John Goodridge, had supported the British during the Revolution. Rather than accompany him, Aberdeen had left his master’s service and surrendered himself to Patriot authorities, believing his conduct demonstrated loyalty to the American cause. Despite that decision, he had been taken to the lead mines in May 1776 and forced to work there for approximately seven years.
In his petition, Aberdeen argued that his wartime service and decision to leave a Loyalist enslaver entitled him to freedom. The Virginia General Assembly ultimately granted his request, providing a rare documented instance of an enslaved worker successfully using Revolutionary principles to challenge his legal status.
Aberdeen’s experience reveals a history that cannot be understood through the production of ammunition alone. The same mines that supplied soldiers fighting for independence also depended upon people who were denied the freedom those soldiers claimed to defend.
For Austinville, the surviving petitions, labor records, and government correspondence preserve an essential part of the community’s Revolutionary history, giving names and experiences to individuals who otherwise might have disappeared from the historical record.
Moses Austin and the Birth of Austinville
Following the Revolutionary War, the mining district experienced another major transformation as entrepreneurs sought to revive its commercial potential. Among the most important was Moses Austin, a Connecticut-born businessman whose interests in lead manufacturing eventually brought him to southwestern Virginia.
Austin had established commercial connections in Philadelphia and Richmond before becoming involved in Virginia’s lead industry. In 1789, he secured a contract to provide lead roofing for the Virginia State Capitol, an arrangement that encouraged his investment in domestic lead production.
Working with his brother Stephen Austin, Moses became associated with the old Chiswell mining properties and attempted to improve their operations through more efficient equipment, skilled workers, and expanded manufacturing.
The Austins also developed the settlement surrounding the mines, which became known as Austinville in honor of the family. Historical accounts commonly identify 1792 as the year Moses Austin established the community under its new name, although the earlier Lead Mines settlement and courthouse had existed for decades.
During this period, Austinville became the birthplace of Stephen Fuller Austin, born on November 3, 1793, to Moses and Maria Brown Austin. Stephen would later become known as the Father of Texas after carrying forward his father’s plans to establish an Anglo-American colony in Mexican Texas.
The connection between the Virginia mining community and Texas history was therefore more than a shared family name. Stephen’s earliest years were spent in a region shaped by mineral production, business speculation, and the movement of people toward the expanding western frontier.
Although the Austins invested considerable effort in the Virginia operations, the business encountered serious financial difficulties. A letter written from Austinville by Charles Austin to Moses Austin on June 18, 1798, provides a particularly revealing account of these struggles.
Charles complained that prolonged rainfall had flooded the mine openings and threatened the summer’s ore production, while damaged crops and pressing financial obligations added to the difficulties. His description offers a direct glimpse into the daily uncertainties of operating a mining enterprise in the mountains.
Further correspondence from December 1800 discussed the valuation of mining property, debts, equipment, and labor. The accompanying accounts also listed enslaved men, women, and children as property, demonstrating that slavery continued to form part of the region’s industrial and agricultural economy after the Revolution.
Moses eventually turned his attention toward the lead deposits of Spanish Upper Louisiana, in what is now Missouri. He established new mining interests around Potosi, where the family relocated during the closing years of the eighteenth century.
Although the Austins moved westward, their association with the Virginia community endured through its name and through Stephen F. Austin’s later prominence in American history. A mining settlement along the New River had become an early chapter in the history of Texas.
Jackson’s Ferry and the Shot Tower
While the Austin family pursued opportunities farther west, lead manufacturing continued in the New River region. One of its most recognizable surviving landmarks is the Jackson Ferry Shot Tower, constructed on a bluff above the river during the early nineteenth century.
The tower is commonly associated with Thomas Jackson, an English immigrant and entrepreneur who became involved in the mining business after the Austin period. The Virginia Department of Historic Resources dates its construction to approximately 1807, although historical research has identified some uncertainty concerning the exact year.
The building served a specialized industrial purpose. Lead from the Austinville mines was melted and poured through sieves near the top of the structure, creating droplets that fell through the air and formed rounded pellets. The tower’s stone structure worked in combination with a shaft extending approximately seventy-five feet into the bluff, allowing the metal to fall far enough to solidify before reaching water below.
Workers then collected the finished shot and prepared it for transportation and sale. The process represented an important development in ammunition manufacturing because it allowed relatively uniform pellets to be produced more efficiently than earlier hand-molding techniques.
The nearby ferry crossing provided an essential transportation connection for residents, travelers, and businesses operating along the New River. Before modern bridges were constructed, ferries linked roads and settlements separated by the waterway, allowing people and goods to move between communities.
Historian Jess Lowry’s 1984 study of Jackson’s Ferry describes the crossing’s earlier association with the Herbert family and the gradual development of the transportation network around the river. His research drew upon historical deeds, local records, and accounts preserved by descendants of the Jackson family.
The shot tower survived long after its original industrial importance declined. Today it remains among the most distinctive historical structures in southwestern Virginia and provides a visible reminder of the region’s once-important lead manufacturing industry.
The Wythe County Lead Mines and the Civil War
Austinville’s importance returned to the national stage when the Civil War began in April 1861. By that time, the mines had undergone several changes in ownership and organization, including the establishment of the Wythe Lead Mines Company in 1838 and the Wythe Union Lead Mine Company in 1848.
The Confederate war effort required immense quantities of ammunition, but the South possessed relatively few major sources of lead. As Union forces restricted trade and disrupted transportation, the Wythe County mines became increasingly important to Confederate military production.
The ore extracted at Austinville was processed into lead that could be transported to ammunition manufacturing centers. According to geologist Robert C. Whisonant’s study of the Wythe County mines, lead was hauled by wagon to Max Meadows, where it could be placed aboard the Virginia and Tennessee Railroad and shipped toward manufacturing facilities in Richmond, Knoxville, and Chattanooga.
The demand became so pressing that Confederate authorities instructed mine operators to maintain maximum production. Across the war years, the Austinville operation produced approximately 3.3 million pounds of lead, representing a substantial portion of the material available for Confederate ammunition.
This production made the mines an important military target. Union commanders understood that destroying the facility could weaken the Confederacy by disrupting one of its principal sources of lead, just as attacks against the salt works at Saltville and the Virginia and Tennessee Railroad threatened other essential resources.
In 1863 and 1864, Union expeditions entered southwestern Virginia with the intention of damaging Confederate infrastructure, but the lead mines initially escaped significant destruction.
That changed in December 1864, when Union Major General George Stoneman launched a cavalry raid from East Tennessee. His forces advanced into southwestern Virginia, destroying railroad property and military supplies as they moved through the region.
After Union troops occupied Wytheville on December 16, Stoneman dispatched cavalry against the lead mines. On December 17, the raiders crossed the New River and attacked the industrial complex.
The small Confederate force assigned to protect the mines withdrew rather than engage the approaching cavalry. Union soldiers subsequently destroyed mining buildings, storehouses, stables, machinery, furnaces, and other equipment necessary to maintain production.
The damage was severe, but the Confederacy’s need for ammunition encouraged efforts to rebuild the facility. By March 22, 1865, the mines had resumed operations, even as the Confederate military situation approached collapse.
In early April, Union cavalry returned and again destroyed portions of the partially repaired works. Only days later, on April 9, Robert E. Lee surrendered the Army of Northern Virginia at Appomattox Court House.
The destruction of the Austinville mines illustrated how the Civil War extended beyond major battlefields into the industrial landscape of Appalachia. Control of mineral resources, transportation routes, and manufacturing facilities could influence the ability of armies to continue fighting, making a small mountain mining community a strategic objective.
From Lead to Zinc and the New Jersey Zinc Company
The end of the Civil War did not end Austinville’s industrial history. Mining resumed during the postwar decades, and changing technology gradually expanded the importance of zinc deposits that had previously received less attention than lead.
By the late nineteenth century, the surrounding mining district was becoming associated with larger commercial operations, including the Bertha Mineral Company. Improvements in extraction, transportation, and mineral processing made previously less profitable deposits increasingly valuable.
In 1902, the New Jersey Zinc Company acquired the Austinville operation, beginning a new era that would shape the community for much of the twentieth century.
Under the company’s ownership, the mining enterprise developed into a considerably more mechanized operation. Underground passages extended deeper into the mineral-bearing rock, while specialized equipment allowed larger quantities of material to be extracted and processed.
One important development came during the 1920s, when improvements in flotation processing made it possible to separate lead and zinc minerals more efficiently from crushed ore. This transformed the economics of the operation, allowing the company to recover valuable minerals from deposits that earlier generations could not have processed as effectively.
The mining district also expanded into the Ivanhoe area, where additional underground deposits became part of the larger industrial system. Machinery, underground rail transportation, crushing equipment, and processing plants increasingly replaced the smaller-scale methods of earlier centuries.
The extent of this transformation appears in a report written by E. T. Weinberg of the New Jersey Zinc Company and published in Virginia Minerals in February 1980.
Weinberg described an operation extending for approximately six miles along the mineral deposits, with underground levels reaching depths of roughly 1,200 feet. Ore was crushed underground, transported to the surface, and processed through a large flotation mill that produced zinc and lead concentrates, along with agricultural limestone.
Water remained one of the operation’s greatest difficulties. According to Weinberg, approximately 19 million gallons had to be pumped from the mines each day to keep the underground workings usable.
The scale of production reflected how thoroughly the industry had changed. At the time of Weinberg’s report, the operation was processing approximately 500,000 tons of ore annually, a remarkable contrast with the small colonial mine workings of the eighteenth century.
For residents of Austinville and neighboring communities, the industrial operation also represented generations of employment. Miners, mechanics, equipment operators, supervisors, and other workers participated in an industry that had become deeply connected to the economic life of the New River region.
Yet the prosperity of the mines depended upon metal prices, production costs, and the availability of profitable deposits. Even as the company maintained substantial operations, changing market conditions placed increasing pressure on its future.
The Closing of the Mines and a Changing Community
By the late 1970s, Austinville’s lead and zinc industry faced significant economic difficulties. Metal prices, energy expenses, labor costs, and other operating requirements placed pressure on the profitability of the underground operation.
In his 1980 report, Weinberg acknowledged these difficulties and warned that unfavorable economic conditions could cause the mines to close before their mineral deposits were completely exhausted.
That warning soon became reality.
On December 31, 1981, the New Jersey Zinc Company permanently closed its underground lead and zinc mining operations at Austinville, ending a period of metal production traditionally counted as approximately 225 years.
The closure marked an important transition in the community’s history. For generations, the mines had connected Austinville to regional employment, transportation networks, and the changing American industrial economy. Their disappearance as a major metal-producing operation brought an end to a remarkable chapter of Appalachian mining.
Nevertheless, the property did not become entirely abandoned.
In 1982, the James River Limestone Company acquired the site and began using limestone resources and material associated with the former mining operations for agricultural purposes. The production of agricultural lime provided a different economic use for the property, allowing industrial activity to continue even though underground lead and zinc extraction had ended.
Subsequent ownership changes led to the development of Austinville Limestone Company, which continued producing limestone products for agricultural and commercial markets.
The surviving facilities and surrounding landscape consequently reflect several different periods of industrial development, from the original colonial lead mines to twentieth-century mineral processing and later limestone production.
Preserving Austinville’s Industrial and Historical Legacy
Much of Austinville’s early mining landscape has changed over the centuries, but the community’s historical importance survives through preserved structures, archival collections, and the records left by those who worked in the industry.
The Jackson Ferry Shot Tower remains one of the most recognizable landmarks associated with the region’s lead production. Listed on the Virginia Landmarks Register in 1968 and the National Register of Historic Places in 1969, the tower is preserved within Virginia’s state park system and continues to introduce visitors to the early history of ammunition manufacturing along the New River.
Other surviving historical evidence exists in the records of mining companies, county courts, and government agencies. Virginia Tech Special Collections maintains extensive New Jersey Zinc Corporation records that document industrial operations during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, while the Library of Virginia preserves court records and other documents relating to the earlier mining enterprises.
Additional historical material has been recovered from the former New Jersey Zinc property itself. Beginning in 2018, the Virginia Department of Energy, working with the United States Geological Survey, undertook a project to preserve mining documents that had remained in storage for decades.
The collection included maps, drilling information, geological records, handwritten notebooks, photographs, and other documents associated with the development of the mining district. Preservation work continued through 2021, ensuring that important parts of Austinville’s industrial history would remain available for future research.
These records make it possible to examine the history of the community beyond the well-known stories of John Chiswell, Moses Austin, and Stephen F. Austin. They preserve evidence of the workers who sustained the mines, the technologies that transformed production, and the economic decisions that shaped life in the region.
Perhaps most importantly, they allow the experiences of people such as Aberdeen, Lucy, Phillis, Sarah, and Phoebe to become part of the historical narrative rather than remaining hidden behind the accomplishments of business owners and military leaders.
Why Austinville’s History Matters
Few small Appalachian communities can claim historical connections extending from colonial territorial disputes to the American Revolution, the settlement of Texas, the Civil War, and the industrial transformations of the twentieth century. Austinville’s location along the New River brought together mineral resources, transportation routes, labor, and ambitious business ventures in ways that repeatedly connected the community to events far beyond southwestern Virginia.
The lead mines helped sustain two different American war efforts, supplying Patriot forces during the Revolution and Confederate armies during the Civil War. They attracted skilled workers from overseas, depended upon the labor of enslaved African Americans, and eventually developed into a major industrial enterprise employing generations of regional residents.
Austinville also served as the administrative center of a county that once included all of Kentucky, while the Austin family’s connection to the community helped establish a historical link between the mountains of Virginia and the later development of Texas.
Today the New River continues to flow past the old mining district, where the surviving shot tower, altered industrial landscape, and preserved historical records offer reminders of the people who lived and worked there.
For those who study Appalachian history, Austinville demonstrates that the region’s communities were never isolated from the wider American story. The minerals beneath the mountains influenced military campaigns, encouraged migration, created wealth, and sustained industries whose consequences reached across generations.
The history of Austinville is therefore more than the story of a mine or the settlement that grew around it. It is the history of a community whose resources helped shape the development of a nation, while the lives of its workers reveal the difficult human experiences behind that achievement.
Sources & Further Reading
Aberdeen. “Aberdeen Petition, November 5, 1783.” Virginia Untold: The African American Narrative, Library of Virginia. Reproduced in Encyclopedia Virginia. https://encyclopediavirginia.org/primary-documents/aberdeen-petition-november-5-1783/
Austin, Charles. “Charles Austin to Moses Austin, June 18, 1798.” In The Austin Papers, edited by Eugene C. Barker. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1924. Digital Austin Papers. https://www.digitalaustinpapers.org/document?id=APB0031.xml
Austin, Charles. “Charles Austin to Moses Austin, December 8, 1800.” In The Austin Papers, edited by Eugene C. Barker. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1924. Digital Austin Papers. https://www.digitalaustinpapers.org/document?id=APB0047.xml
Austin, James. “James Austin to Moses Austin, November 15, 1801.” Moses and Stephen F. Austin Papers, Dolph Briscoe Center for American History. University of North Texas Libraries, The Portal to Texas History. https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth216100/
Austin, James. “James Austin to Moses Austin, March 22, 1802.” Moses and Stephen F. Austin Papers, Dolph Briscoe Center for American History. University of North Texas Libraries, The Portal to Texas History. https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth216102/
Austin, Moses. “Moses Austin to Unknown, August 1, 1791.” Notes concerning the manufacture of lead shot. Digital Austin Papers. https://www.digitalaustinpapers.org/document?id=APB0002.xml
Austin, Stephen. “Stephen Austin to James Austin, December 28, 1798.” Moses and Stephen F. Austin Papers, Dolph Briscoe Center for American History. University of North Texas Libraries, The Portal to Texas History. https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth215984/
Austin, Stephen. “Stephen Austin to James Austin, March 8, 1799.” Moses and Stephen F. Austin Papers, Dolph Briscoe Center for American History. University of North Texas Libraries, The Portal to Texas History. https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth215985/
Austin, Stephen. “Stephen Austin to Unknown, January 10, 1801.” In The Austin Papers, edited by Eugene C. Barker. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1924. Digital Austin Papers. https://www.digitalaustinpapers.org/document?id=APB0051.xml
Currier, L. W. Zinc and Lead Region of Southwestern Virginia. Virginia Geological Survey Bulletin 43. Charlottesville: Virginia Geological Survey, 1935. https://energy.virginia.gov/commercedocs/BUL_43.pdf
Foley, Nora K. “A Geoenvironmental Lifecycle Model: The Austinville Platform Carbonate Deposit, Virginia.” In Progress on Geoenvironmental Models for Selected Mineral Deposit Types, edited by Robert R. Seal II and Nora K. Foley, 101–7. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 02-195. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey, 2002. https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2002/of02-195/OF-02-195-508-V5.pdf
Gallagher, Sean. “Chiswell’s Lead Mines in the American Revolution.” Encyclopedia Virginia. Virginia Humanities. https://encyclopediavirginia.org/entries/chiswells-lead-mines-in-the-american-revolution/
Gallagher, Sean. “The Prison of Public Works: Enslaved People and State Formation at Virginia’s Chiswell Lead Mines, 1775–1786.” Journal of Southern History 86, no. 4 (November 2020): 777–804. https://doi.org/10.1353/soh.2020.0239
Hay, William. “Letter from William Hay to Benjamin Harrison, June 10, 1782.” In Calendar of Virginia State Papers and Other Manuscripts, edited by William P. Palmer, vol. 3, 189–90. Richmond, VA, 1883. Reproduced in Encyclopedia Virginia. https://encyclopediavirginia.org/primary-documents/letter-from-william-hay-to-benjamin-harrison-june-10-1782/
Jefferson, Thomas. “Letter from Thomas Jefferson to William Preston, June 15, 1780.” Founders Online, National Archives. Reproduced in Encyclopedia Virginia. https://encyclopediavirginia.org/primary-documents/letter-from-thomas-jefferson-to-william-preston-june-15-1780/
Jefferson, Thomas. “Letter from Thomas Jefferson to William Campbell, July 3, 1780.” Founders Online, National Archives. Reproduced in Encyclopedia Virginia. https://encyclopediavirginia.org/primary-documents/letter-from-thomas-jefferson-to-william-campbell-july-3-1780/
Johnston, David E. A History of Middle New River Settlements and Contiguous Territory. Huntington, WV: Standard Printing and Publishing Company, 1906. Library of Congress. https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/public/gdcmassbookdig/historyofmiddlen00davi/historyofmiddlen00davi_bw.pdf
Kegley, Mary B. “Fort Chiswell and Chiswell’s Lead Mines of Wythe County, Virginia: A New Perspective.” The Smithfield Review 14 (2010): 52–68. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/88176/SR_v14_kegley.pdf
Library of Virginia. “Wythe County Microfilm.” County and City Records on Microfilm. Richmond: Library of Virginia. https://www.lva.virginia.gov/collections/ccmf/VA/VA305
Lowry, Jess. “Shot Tower Historical State Park and Jackson’s Ferry.” Proceedings of the New River Symposium, 1984. National Park Service History Collection. https://npshistory.com/series/symposia/new_river/sec1.htm
Newell, James. “James Newell to Moses Austin, November 20, 1795.” Land surveying agreement concerning Wythe and Russell Counties. Digital Austin Papers. https://www.digitalaustinpapers.org/document?id=APB0018.xml
Newell, James. “James Newell to Moses Austin, November 20, 1795.” Survey certification prepared at Austinville, Virginia. Digital Austin Papers. https://www.digitalaustinpapers.org/document?id=APB0017.xml
Ruston, Thomas. “Thomas Ruston to Joseph Burr, November 2, 1794.” In The Austin Papers, edited by Eugene C. Barker. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1924. Digital Austin Papers. https://www.digitalaustinpapers.org/document?id=APB0005.xml
Ruston, Thomas. “Thomas Ruston to Moses Austin, November 14, 1794.” In The Austin Papers, edited by Eugene C. Barker. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1924. Digital Austin Papers. https://www.digitalaustinpapers.org/document?id=APB0006.xml
Summers, Lewis Preston. History of Southwest Virginia, 1746–1786, Washington County, 1777–1870. Richmond, VA: J. L. Hill Printing Company, 1903. Library of Congress. https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/public/gdcmassbookdig/historyofsouthwe00summ/historyofsouthwe00summ_bw.pdf
Third Revolutionary Convention of Virginia. “An Ordinance for Providing Arms and Ammunition for the Use of This Colony.” July 1775. In William Waller Hening, The Statutes at Large, vol. 9, 71–73. Reproduced in Encyclopedia Virginia. https://encyclopediavirginia.org/primary-documents/an-ordinance-for-providing-arms-and-ammunition-for-the-use-of-this-colony-july-1775/
United States Geological Survey. “Lead.” Virginia Department of Energy, Geology and Mineral Resources. https://energy.virginia.gov/geology/Lead.shtml
Virginia Department of Energy. “Civil War Minerals.” Geology and Mineral Resources. https://energy.virginia.gov/geology/CivilWarMinerals.shtml
Virginia Department of Energy. “Historic Mining.” Mineral Mining Program. https://energy.virginia.gov/mineral-mining/HistoricMining.shtml
Virginia Department of Energy. “New Jersey Zinc Company: A Legacy of Mining.” Mineral Mining Program. https://energy.virginia.gov/mineral-mining/NewJerseyZincCompany.shtml
Virginia Department of Historic Resources. “Fort Chiswell Site.” Virginia Landmarks Register and National Register of Historic Places, 098-0026. https://www.dhr.virginia.gov/historic-registers/098-0026/
Virginia Department of Historic Resources. “Shot Tower.” Virginia Landmarks Register and National Register of Historic Places, 098-0016. https://www.dhr.virginia.gov/historic-registers/098-0016/
Virginia Department of Historic Resources. Andrew and Sarah Fulton Farm. National Register of Historic Places Registration Form, 2022. https://www.dhr.virginia.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/098-5634_Fulton_Farm_2022_NRHP_FINAL.pdf
Virginia Gazette. “Fincastle Resolutions.” February 10, 1775. Reproduced in Encyclopedia Virginia. https://encyclopediavirginia.org/primary-documents/fincastle-resolutions-virginia-gazette-february-10-1775/
Virginia Tech Special Collections and University Archives. “New Jersey Zinc Corporation [Austinville, VA] Records, 1850–1969.” Collection Ms1991-032. Blacksburg: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. https://aspace.lib.vt.edu/repositories/2/resources/1841
Virginia Tech Special Collections and University Archives. “Jackson Ferry Shot Tower Linocut.” Conway Smith, ca. 1930. Collection Ms2010-050. Blacksburg: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. https://aspace.lib.vt.edu/repositories/2/resources/2603
VirginiaPlaces. “Lead Mining at Austinville.” VirginiaPlaces.org. https://www.virginiaplaces.org/geology/austinvile.html
Watson, Thomas L. Lead and Zinc Deposits of Virginia. Virginia Geological Survey Bulletin, 1905. https://books.google.com/books?id=ra4_AAAAYAAJ
Weinberg, E. T. “Austinville Mining: 1756 to Present.” Virginia Minerals 26, no. 1 (February 1980): 11. https://energy.virginia.gov/commercedocs/VAMIN_VOL26_NO01.pdf
Whisonant, Robert C. “Geology and the Civil War in Southwestern Virginia: The Wythe County Lead Mines.” Virginia Minerals 42, no. 2 (May 1996). https://energy.virginia.gov/commercedocs/VAMIN_VOL42_NO02.pdf
William Ogilvy. “The Treaty of Hard Labor, October 14, 1768.” In The Colonial Records of North Carolina, vol. 7, 851–55. Reproduced in Encyclopedia Virginia. https://encyclopediavirginia.org/primary-documents/the-treaty-of-hard-labor-october-14-1768/
Author Note: