Bloody Breathitt and the Courthouse Murder of J. B. Marcum

Appalachian History Series – Bloody Breathitt and the Courthouse Murder of J. B. Marcum

On the morning of May 4, 1903, attorney James Buchanan Marcum entered the Breathitt County Courthouse in Jackson, Kentucky. He had come to file legal papers connected to the political struggle that had divided the county for years.

Marcum never made it safely through the courthouse doorway.

A gunman fired from behind him while he stood near the entrance talking with Captain B. J. Ewen. Marcum fell where generations of Breathitt County residents had entered seeking justice, recording deeds, contesting elections, and answering criminal charges. A second shot followed, leaving no doubt that the killing had been an execution rather than a sudden quarrel.

Marcum’s murder became one of the most notorious killings in Appalachian history. Newspapers across the country described it as another episode in a Kentucky mountain feud, but the events surrounding his death were far more complicated. The struggle involved disputed elections, courthouse patronage, armed political factions, frightened witnesses, compromised officials, and a local organization accused of using murder to maintain control.

The killing of J. B. Marcum was not simply the result of two families carrying an inherited grudge. It was an assassination carried out at the center of county government.

A Courthouse at the Center of Power

In late nineteenth-century eastern Kentucky, control of a county courthouse meant far more than possessing a few elected offices. County officials appointed deputies, selected jurors, awarded contracts, collected taxes, supervised roads, influenced prosecutions, and distributed jobs among political supporters.

In a county where formal government was one of the largest sources of steady employment and authority, an election victory could create an organization powerful enough to reward friends and punish enemies.

By the end of the 1890s, the organization surrounding the Hargis family had become the dominant political force in Breathitt County. James Hargis operated a substantial mercantile business in Jackson and ran for county judge. His brother Alexander Hargis sought a seat in the Kentucky Senate. Their ally Ed Callahan ran for sheriff.

Opposition to their growing power crossed ordinary party lines. Republicans joined dissatisfied Democrats in a Fusion ticket intended to defeat the Hargis and Callahan candidates. The Hargis organization prevailed in the 1898 election, but opponents alleged that the vote had been manipulated and challenged the results in court.

James Buchanan Marcum became one of the attorneys representing the Fusion side.

That decision placed him directly against men who controlled the very courthouse where the election dispute would be heard.

The Lawyer Who Challenged the Organization

Marcum was not an obscure political agitator. He was a respected attorney, a former United States commissioner, a husband, and a father of five. Contemporary accounts described him as a man who had attempted to remain outside Breathitt County’s violent factions until his legal responsibilities drew him into the election contest.

The election case was not his only confrontation with the Hargis organization.

During the worsening conflict, Benjamin Hargis, a younger brother of James and Alexander, was killed during an encounter with Jackson marshal Thomas Cockrell. Marcum helped defend Cockrell, who was cleared in connection with the shooting. Another Hargis brother, John, was killed aboard a train after a confrontation with a railroad detective.

Each death deepened the division surrounding the courthouse.

Marcum’s legal work increasingly connected him to the Cockrell side of the struggle, but describing the conflict as a simple Hargis against Cockrell family feud hides its political character. Men joined the opposing sides through business relationships, public offices, election loyalties, legal representation, and personal dependence. Some of the supposed enemies were related by blood or marriage.

The dispute was not separated from government. It operated through government.

Blood Around the Jackson Courthouse

The courthouse in Jackson gradually became more than the symbolic center of the conflict. It became part of the physical landscape of murder.

Dr. B. D. Cox, who was associated with the opponents of the Hargis organization, was assassinated near his home. James Cockrell, who had succeeded his brother as town marshal, was shot repeatedly while standing near the courthouse square. Witnesses believed the shots that killed Cockrell had come from an upper part of the courthouse itself.

The implications were terrifying.

If an assassin could fire from inside the county courthouse and escape prosecution, the building no longer represented neutral law. It had become a fortress from which one political faction could allegedly strike its enemies.

Residents learned to watch windows, doorways, and second-floor rooms. Potential witnesses understood that the men accused of violence had friends among the officials responsible for making arrests, selecting juries, and guarding prisoners.

Marcum continued trying to fight the organization through court filings, affidavits, and election proceedings. He also began recording what he believed was happening in Breathitt County.

Marcum Predicts His Own Murder

In November 1902, the Lexington Morning Herald published a remarkable front-page report titled “Startling Charges in Affidavits Filed in Breathitt Circuit Court.”

The newspaper reproduced a letter from Marcum describing the recent killings, political intimidation, and threats surrounding the Jackson courthouse. He accused the organization opposing him of influencing juries, frightening witnesses, and protecting men responsible for violence. Most chillingly, he explained that he believed his own assassination was being planned.

The same newspaper report included a sworn statement from Moses Feltner. Feltner said he had learned of a plan to kill Marcum and had warned the attorney about the danger.

These statements are among the most important surviving primary sources connected to the case. They show that Marcum’s death was not interpreted as an ordinary quarrel even before it happened. Marcum and Feltner described an organized effort to remove political opponents and prevent witnesses from using the courts.

Marcum’s enemies knew he was making allegations against them. The public knew that he had predicted his murder. State officials knew that violence had surrounded the county government.

Still, he received no protection capable of saving him.

For months, Marcum reportedly limited his movements and took extraordinary precautions when leaving home. Yet he remained a practicing attorney. Every legal challenge required him to return to the courthouse controlled by the men he had accused.

On May 4, 1903, he went there again.

Murder at the Courthouse Door

Marcum had reportedly finished filing papers connected to the contested election proceedings when he paused near the courthouse entrance to speak with Captain B. J. Ewen.

Ewen was a local businessman, former deputy sheriff, and one of the few men willing to describe publicly what he had seen inside Jackson. His position beside Marcum made him the most important eyewitness to the killing.

A shot struck Marcum from behind. According to Ewen’s later testimony, Curtis Jett appeared in the courthouse hallway and fired another shot at Marcum after he had fallen. The second discharge occurred at extremely close range. Marcum died without speaking.

Jett was closely connected to the Hargis family and already carried a reputation for violence. Thomas White, another man associated with the Hargis organization, was accused of participating in the assassination.

The killing occurred in daylight, near witnesses, at the entrance to a public building. Yet no immediate local prosecution inspired confidence. The courthouse organization that Marcum had challenged still influenced the machinery responsible for identifying, arresting, and trying his killers.

The location appeared deliberately chosen. Marcum was not attacked on an isolated mountain path or at a remote cabin. He was killed where his death would send the clearest possible message.

The law could not protect a man even at the courthouse door.

The News Spreads Across the Country

Reports of Marcum’s assassination traveled rapidly.

The San Antonio Daily Light published a notice on the day of the killing. The Courier-Journal devoted prominent coverage to the murder in its May 5 edition. Newspapers in Virginia, Michigan, Indiana, California, Georgia, Colorado, and other states repeated the dispatch.

Many headlines described the murder as part of a “Kentucky vendetta” or mountain feud. National reporters presented Jackson as a place beyond ordinary civilization, filled with gunmen, frightened jurors, and hereditary killers.

Some of the reporting captured the genuine terror surrounding the courthouse. Other accounts treated Breathitt County residents as naturally violent people trapped in an ancient culture of revenge.

That interpretation made the story easy for outside readers to understand, but it also concealed the political structure behind the bloodshed. Calling every killing a feud made organized violence appear private and irrational. It shifted attention away from elections, offices, contracts, law enforcement, and courthouse control.

The publicity nevertheless forced Kentucky’s state government to act.

State Troops Enter Jackson

Governor J. C. W. Beckham consulted Circuit Judge D. B. Redwine as officials prepared a special term of court to investigate the killings of Marcum, Dr. Cox, and James Cockrell.

By late May, Kentucky soldiers were ordered into Jackson to preserve the peace, protect witnesses, guard prisoners, and secure the courthouse. The official history of the Kentucky National Guard described a force that included infantrymen and artillery personnel. A Gatling gun was positioned in the courthouse yard.

Soldiers searched men entering the courtroom for weapons. They guarded jurors and patrolled the town. A military detachment traveled to Winchester to take Curtis Jett into custody, while another party entered the mountains to arrest Thomas White.

Rumors soon spread that armed men intended to storm the jail and rescue the prisoners. The guard was doubled. One nervous sentry fired during a false alarm, killing a stray cow mistaken in the darkness for an approaching rider.

The incident sounded almost comic when later recorded in the regimental history, but it revealed the atmosphere surrounding the trial. Soldiers stationed in an American county seat believed they might have to defend the jail and courthouse against an armed assault.

The militia remained involved long after the initial arrests. A main body eventually left Jackson, but a smaller provost guard stayed until December 1903. According to the National Guard history, the entire deployment lasted more than six months.

For a time, the Breathitt County Courthouse functioned less like an ordinary seat of government and more like a fortified military position.

The Courage and Cost of B. J. Ewen

The case depended heavily upon the testimony of B. J. Ewen.

Many Jackson residents had heard the shots or seen men moving through the courthouse, but private knowledge did not always become courtroom testimony. Witnesses feared losing their jobs, homes, businesses, or lives.

Ewen nevertheless testified that he had seen Jett in the courthouse and witnessed the shooting. His testimony gave prosecutors a direct account tying the accused men to Marcum’s death.

The consequences followed quickly.

The hotel and property associated with Ewen were destroyed by fire after he became a witness. Contemporary reports treated the blaze as an act of retaliation. The militia helped fight the fire while soldiers continued protecting the court proceedings.

The destruction of Ewen’s property demonstrated why so many witnesses remained silent. Testifying did not merely require standing before a jury. It meant continuing to live in a town where the defendant’s friends might know where a witness slept, worked, and kept everything he owned.

The state could place soldiers around the courtroom, but it could not permanently place guards around every witness.

The First Trial in Breathitt County

Curtis Jett and Thomas White were jointly indicted for Marcum’s murder by a special Breathitt County grand jury.

The first trial took place in Jackson under military protection. Soldiers guarded the courthouse, jurors, witnesses, and prisoners. Even these precautions could not produce a verdict.

The jury failed to agree. Contemporary and later accounts reported that eleven jurors favored conviction while one held out. Whether that division resulted from honest doubt, factional loyalty, intimidation, or some combination of the three could not be proven. What was clear was that a trial in Breathitt County had not resolved the case.

Prosecutors argued that local conditions made a fair proceeding impossible. In an affidavit supporting a change of venue, the commonwealth’s attorney described such a state of lawlessness that officers could not reliably summon witnesses and jurors could not freely return an impartial verdict.

The court transferred the case to Harrison County.

That decision was an admission of how thoroughly local government had failed. Breathitt County could indict the suspected killers only with soldiers guarding the courthouse, and it could not complete their prosecution before a local jury.

Conviction at Cynthiana

The second trial took place in the Harrison Circuit Court at Cynthiana.

Far from the Hargis organization’s strongest base, Ewen again testified. Prosecutors presented the killing as a planned assassination in which Jett and White acted together.

On August 15, 1903, the jury convicted both men of Marcum’s murder. Each received life imprisonment.

Thomas White appealed. In its 1905 opinion, the Kentucky Court of Appeals summarized the extraordinary procedural history of the case. It confirmed that the first Breathitt County trial had ended in a mistrial, that the prosecution had sought a change of venue because of local lawlessness, and that the Harrison County proceeding had ended with life sentences for both defendants.

The court affirmed White’s conviction.

Jett also faced prosecution for the murder of James Cockrell. The numerous cases involving Jett, White, Hargis, Callahan, and other defendants created a complicated legal record in several counties. Verdicts were appealed, trials were moved, witnesses changed their accounts, and confessions were made and withdrawn.

Only Jett and White served prison sentences for Marcum’s death.

Witnesses Bought, Threatened, and Removed

The struggle did not end with the convictions of the gunmen.

Marcum’s widow filed a civil action accusing James Hargis, Ed Callahan, and others of responsibility for her husband’s murder. The case was transferred to Clark County and tried at Winchester.

Once again, witnesses became the central problem.

Later Kentucky appellate opinions preserved evidence that men expected to testify against the Hargis organization were persuaded to leave the state. In one case involving Moses Feltner, the court described an arrangement in which money was paid to keep him away from the Marcum trial. The opinion concluded that the evidence demonstrated a criminal conspiracy to remove a witness.

Contempt proceedings followed against several people accused of helping witnesses disappear. Newspaper reports described warrants, missing witnesses, bribes, and promises of protection from other criminal charges.

The witness problem reveals the limits of focusing only on the men who pulled the triggers. A political organization did not need to murder every opponent if it could frighten witnesses, influence jurors, move people out of Kentucky, and exhaust prosecutors through repeated trials.

Marcum had warned about precisely such a system before his death.

The Case Against Hargis and Callahan

Curtis Jett eventually made statements accusing Judge James Hargis and Sheriff Ed Callahan of directing or encouraging the murders of Marcum and other opponents. Other implicated men also offered testimony connecting the political leaders to the violence.

These accusations were powerful, but the witnesses often carried serious credibility problems. Some had participated in crimes themselves. Some expected leniency. Others changed their statements or disappeared before trial.

Hargis and Callahan faced criminal proceedings related to the alleged conspiracy, but juries did not convict them of Marcum’s murder. They were acquitted after years of accusations, venue changes, disputed testimony, and unsuccessful prosecutions.

The civil case produced a different result.

Marcum’s widow had sought $100,000 in damages. A Clark County jury awarded her $8,000 against James Hargis and Ed Callahan while clearing Alexander Hargis. The verdict did not send either man to prison, but it represented a legal finding that the evidence was sufficient to impose financial responsibility for Marcum’s death.

The difference between the criminal acquittals and the civil verdict reflected different standards of proof, but it also reflected the damaged condition of the evidence. Years of intimidation, bribery, shifting testimony, and local fear made certainty difficult to achieve.

Marcum’s killers could be identified. Proving how far responsibility extended into the courthouse organization was much harder.

The Ballad of J. B. Marcum

Marcum’s death soon passed from newspapers and courtrooms into Appalachian song.

Commercial musicians recorded versions of “The Death of J. B. Marcum” and “The Murder of J. B. Markham” during the 1920s. In 1937, Alan and Elizabeth Lomax recorded Kentucky singers performing what became known as “The J. B. Marcum Song” or “The Ballad of J. B. Marcum.”

One surviving version was performed by Maynard Britton in Clay County. Its melody and refrain borrowed from the ballad of Jesse James, linking Marcum’s courthouse assassination to an older musical tradition of murder, betrayal, outlawry, and public judgment.

The ballad simplified the case. Songs rarely preserve the procedural complexity of affidavits, venue changes, appeals, and civil litigation. Instead, the singers remembered a respected lawyer, a courthouse assassination, frightened witnesses, and killers connected to powerful men.

The song should not be treated as courtroom evidence. It is evidence of memory.

Long after the trials ended, Appalachian singers continued placing Marcum at the courthouse door. In their versions, his murder remained a warning about what could happen when political power became stronger than the law.

The Meaning of “Bloody Breathitt”

For generations, writers described Marcum’s murder as part of the feud history of “Bloody Breathitt.”

The nickname was not entirely invented. Breathitt County experienced extraordinary levels of violence, and residents lived with real fear. Yet the feud label encouraged outsiders to imagine the county as a place cut off from modern America, where primitive families killed one another for reasons no civilized person could understand.

Historian T. R. C. Hutton challenged that interpretation in his study Bloody Breathitt: Politics and Violence in the Appalachian South. Hutton demonstrated that many killings traditionally described as feuds were connected to elections, public office, economic development, political legitimacy, and control of local institutions.

In that interpretation, Breathitt County was not violent because its people lived outside modern politics. It was violent because political power mattered intensely and because local institutions were vulnerable to capture.

The courthouse organization surrounding Hargis and Callahan operated in a world of railroads, timber development, newspapers, state elections, legal appeals, and government patronage. Its alleged methods were brutal, but its goals were modern. It sought offices, influence, wealth, contracts, and control.

Calling Marcum’s death a feud makes the murder seem like a private matter between hostile families.

Calling it a political assassination forces a different question.

What happens when the people accused of organizing violence also influence the courthouse where that violence must be prosecuted?

A Murder at the Door of Justice

James Buchanan Marcum believed in written affidavits, election petitions, court filings, and sworn testimony. He attempted to expose the organization opposing him by placing its actions into the public record.

His enemies answered at the courthouse door.

The state eventually sent soldiers. Jett and White were convicted. Marcum’s widow won a civil judgment. Appellate courts preserved evidence of lawlessness, witness removal, and intimidation. Ballad singers preserved the emotional memory of the killing.

None of those outcomes could restore Marcum’s life or erase the message sent by his assassination.

The enduring importance of the case lies in the location where he died. The Breathitt County Courthouse should have been the safest place for a lawyer challenging political corruption. Instead, it became the place where that challenge was silenced.

Marcum’s murder revealed more than the violence of one faction or the failure of one trial. It showed how quickly democracy could become dangerous when elections, law enforcement, juries, and public offices fell under the influence of a single organization.

The story of Bloody Breathitt is therefore not merely a story about mountain feuds.

It is a story about the fragile distance between a courthouse that administers justice and a courthouse that protects power.

Sources & Further Reading

“Startling Charges in Affidavits Filed in Breathitt Circuit Court.” Morning Herald (Lexington, KY), November 11, 1902, 1. Reproduced and discussed in Stephanie Hall, “Caught My Ear: The Ballad of J. B. Marcum,” Library of Congress. https://blogs.loc.gov/folklife/2018/05/ballad-of-j-b-marcum/

The Courier-Journal (Louisville, KY), May 5, 1903. Chronicling America, Library of Congress. https://www.loc.gov/resource/sn83045188/1903-05-05/ed-1/?st=text

“Marcum Killed by an Unknown Assassin in Entrance of Jackson Ky Courthouse While Talking to a Friend.” Virginian-Pilot (Norfolk, VA), May 5, 1903, 1. Virginia Chronicle. https://www.virginiachronicle.com/?a=d&d=VP19030505.1.1

“Killed in Feud.” Humboldt Times (Eureka, CA), May 6, 1903, 1. California Digital Newspaper Collection. https://cdnc.ucr.edu/?a=d&d=HTS19030506.2.31

“Kentucky Vendetta.” Plymouth Tribune (Plymouth, IN), May 7, 1903, 1. Hoosier State Chronicles. https://newspapers.library.in.gov/?a=d&d=PT19030507.1.1

“Curtis Jett Arrested: He Is Charged with Assassination of J. B. Marcum.” Los Angeles Herald, May 11, 1903. California Digital Newspaper Collection. https://cdnc.ucr.edu/?a=d&d=LAH19030511.2.5

“Fell Victim to a Feud: Hon. James B. Marcum Is Shot Down in the Front Entrance of the Courthouse at Jackson, Ky.” Granada Times (Granada, CO), May 14, 1903. Colorado Historic Newspapers Collection. https://www.coloradohistoricnewspapers.org/?a=d&d=TGS19030514-01.2.102

“Jett and White Are Convicted: Life Imprisonment for Marcum’s Murderers.” St. Paul Pioneer Press, August 15, 1903, 5. Library of Congress Newspaper Directory. https://www.loc.gov/chronicling-america/

Kentucky Court of Appeals. White v. Commonwealth, 120 Ky. 178, 85 S.W. 753, 27 Ky. L. Rptr. 561. March 17, 1905. https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/7223600/white-v-commonwealth/

Kentucky Court of Appeals. Jett v. Commonwealth, 85 S.W. 1179, 27 Ky. L. Rptr. 603. 1905. https://case-law.vlex.com/vid/jett-v-commonwealth-902341507

Kentucky Court of Appeals. Hargis v. Parker, 85 S.W. 704, 27 Ky. L. Rptr. 441. 1905. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Hargis+v.+Parker%22+%2285+S.W.+704%22

Kentucky Court of Appeals. Hargis v. Marcum, 103 S.W. 346, 31 Ky. L. Rptr. 795. 1907. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Hargis+v.+Marcum%22+%22103+S.W.+346%22

Kentucky Court of Appeals. Marcum v. Hargis, 104 S.W. 693, 31 Ky. L. Rptr. 1117. 1907. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Marcum+v.+Hargis%22+%22104+S.W.%22

Kentucky Court of Appeals. Commonwealth v. Hargis, 124 Ky. 356, 99 S.W. 348, 30 Ky. L. Rptr. 510. 1907. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Commonwealth+v.+Hargis%22+%2299+S.W.+348%22

Kentucky Court of Appeals. Herald Publishing Co. v. Feltner, 158 Ky. 35, 164 S.W. 370. March 17, 1914. https://case-law.vlex.com/vid/herald-pub-co-v-901851844

Breathitt County Circuit Court. Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Moses Feltner. Case file, approximately 1902. Breathitt County judicial records, Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives. https://kdla.ky.gov/

Breathitt County Circuit Court. Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Curtis Jett and Thomas White. Indictments, motions, witness records, and trial orders, 1903. Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives. https://kdla.ky.gov/

Harrison County Circuit Court. Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Curtis Jett and Thomas White. Trial and sentencing records, Cynthiana, Kentucky, 1903. Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives. https://kdla.ky.gov/

Clark County Circuit Court. Marcum v. Hargis et al. Wrongful-death case file and associated contempt proceedings, Winchester, Kentucky, approximately 1904–1908. Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives. https://kdla.ky.gov/

Kentucky Adjutant General. Orders, telegrams, correspondence, rosters, and reports concerning the Kentucky National Guard deployment to Jackson, May–December 1903. Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives. https://kdla.access.preservica.com/

Beckham, J. C. W. Gubernatorial correspondence, executive orders, reward proclamations, and communications concerning Breathitt County violence, 1902–1903. Governor’s Papers, Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives. https://kdla.access.preservica.com/

Kentucky Historical Society. Beckham and Wickliffe Families Collection, MSS 19. Frankfort: Martin F. Schmidt Research Library. https://www.kyhistory.com/digital/api/collection/LIB/id/1910/download

Schwarz, W. R., and J. T. Milligan, eds. History of the First Regiment of Infantry, Kentucky National Guard: From Its Organization in 1847 to the Present Day. Louisville: Jobson Printing Company, 1915. https://kynghistory.ky.gov/Media/Publications/Documents/1streghist1915pt2.pdf

McClain, G. Lee, comp. Military History of Kentucky. Frankfort, KY: State Journal, 1939. https://kynghistory.ky.gov/media/publications/dma/militaryhistoryky1939anlrpt.pdf

United States Congress. House Committee on Claims. Emily J. Byrd. 63rd Cong., 2nd sess., House Report, 1914. Includes records identifying J. B. Marcum’s service as a United States commissioner. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/SERIALSET-06764_00_00-039-0905-0000/pdf/SERIALSET-06764_00_00-039-0905-0000.pdf

Hutton, T. R. C. Bloody Breathitt: Politics and Violence in the Appalachian South. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 2013. https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813161242/bloody-breathitt/

Hutton, T. R. C. “‘Bloody Breathitt’: Power and Violence in the Mountain South.” PhD diss., Vanderbilt University, 2009. https://ir.vanderbilt.edu/items/9eccf12c-b3e4-48b5-ae3a-d7a3008f97d2

Hutton, T. R. C. “Assassins and Feudists: Politics and Death in the Bluegrass and Mountains of Kentucky.” In Blood in the Hills: A History of Violence in Appalachia, edited by Bruce E. Stewart, 272–313. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 2012. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt2jcv2d.15

Pearce, John Ed. Days of Darkness: The Feuds of Eastern Kentucky. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1994. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt2jck77

Johnson, Lewis Frederick. Famous Kentucky Tragedies and Trials: A Collection of Important and Interesting Tragedies and Criminal Trials Which Have Taken Place in Kentucky. Louisville: Baldwin Law Book Company, 1916. https://archive.org/details/famouskentuckytr00johnrich

Mutzenberg, Charles G. Kentucky’s Famous Feuds and Tragedies: Authentic History of the World-Renowned Vendettas of the Dark and Bloody Ground. New York: R. F. Fenno and Company, 1917. https://archive.org/details/kentuckysfamousf00mutz

Federal Writers’ Project. In the Land of Breathitt: A Guide to the Feud County. Northport, NY: Bacon, Percy and Daggett, 1941. https://search.worldcat.org/search?q=%22In+the+Land+of+Breathitt%22

Klotter, James C. Kentucky: Portrait in Paradox, 1900–1950. Lexington: Kentucky Historical Society and University Press of Kentucky, 1996. https://books.google.com/books/about/Kentucky.html?id=o58mJavC4msC

Nelson, Donald Lee. “The Death of J. B. Marcum.” John Edwards Memorial Foundation Quarterly 11, no. 37 (Spring 1975): 7–22. https://archive.org/details/jemfquarterlyser1971john

Hall, Stephanie. “Caught My Ear: The Ballad of J. B. Marcum.” Folklife Today, Library of Congress, May 4, 2018. https://blogs.loc.gov/folklife/2018/05/ballad-of-j-b-marcum/

Britton, Maynard. “The J. B. Marcum Song,” parts 1 and 2. Recorded by Alan Lomax at Big Creek, Clay County, Kentucky, October 15, 1937. Alan and Elizabeth Lomax Kentucky Collection, American Folklife Center. https://lomaxky.omeka.net/items/show/923

Unidentified performer. “The J. B. Marcum Song.” Recorded October 1, 1937. Alan and Elizabeth Lomax Kentucky Collection, American Folklife Center. https://lomaxky.omeka.net/items/show/683

Chestnut, Ted, performing as Cal Turner, with Fiddlin’ Doc Roberts. “The Death of J. B. Marcum.” Gennett 15544. Recorded in Richmond, Indiana, May 10, 1928. Discographical information in the John Edwards Memorial Foundation Quarterly. https://archive.org/details/jemfquarterlyser1971john

McFarland, Lester, and Robert A. Gardner. “The Murder of J. B. Markham.” Brunswick 350 and Supertone S2035. Recorded August 14, 1928. Discussed in Stephanie Hall, “Caught My Ear: The Ballad of J. B. Marcum.” https://blogs.loc.gov/folklife/2018/05/ballad-of-j-b-marcum/

Waltz, Robert B., and David G. Engle. “J. B. Marcum: A Kentucky Feud Song, Laws E19.” Traditional Ballad Index: An Annotated Bibliography of the Folk Songs of the English-Speaking World. California State University, Fresno. https://balladindex.org/Ballads/LE19.html

Berea College Special Collections and Archives. Appalachian Feuds Collection, 1898–1977. Berea, Kentucky. https://bereaarchives.libraryhost.com/repositories/2/resources/9

Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives. Kentucky State Digital Archives and Government Records Collections. Frankfort, Kentucky. https://kdla.access.preservica.com/

Kentucky Digital Library. Historic Kentucky newspapers, manuscripts, photographs, and archival collections. Kentucky Virtual Library. https://kdl.kyvl.org/

University of Kentucky Libraries. Kentucky Newspaper Project, Kentucky Digital Newspapers Database, and historic newspaper microfilm holdings. Lexington, Kentucky. https://libraries.uky.edu/find-borrow/find-library-materials/find-materials-type/newspapers-microforms

Author Note: J. B. Marcum’s murder has often been reduced to another tale of mountain feuding, but the surviving records reveal a struggle over elections, law, and courthouse power. This article seeks to remember Marcum as a lawyer who challenged that system while treating Breathitt County as a real community rather than a national stereotype.

https://doi.org/10.59350/appalachianhistorian.363

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top